|
|
Post by Broph on Sept 3, 2012 20:03:59 GMT -6
should we make the future picks currently owed in the NBA owed here, (only future firsts, seconds would be a bit absurd)
|
|
|
|
Post by ilovebball on Sept 3, 2012 20:05:01 GMT -6
OH HELLLLLLLL YEEESSS.
Toronto's guaranteed lotto = WIN
|
|
|
|
Post by Magna Carta on Sept 3, 2012 20:05:46 GMT -6
OH HELLLLLLLL YEEESSS. Toronto's guaranteed lotto = WIN meh.. I'm indifferent really but seeing this makes me lean towards no. Toronto GM going to be tight |
|
|
|
Post by ilovebball on Sept 3, 2012 20:08:14 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on Sept 3, 2012 20:10:49 GMT -6
Yes. If a team gave up some good picks to get a good player, they shouldn't be able to use those to then toss out for an upgrade.
|
|
|
|
Post by ilovebball on Sept 3, 2012 20:12:08 GMT -6
True, Houston did give Lowry for that pick and Lowry should be a solid starter.
|
|
|
|
Post by losanglife on Sept 3, 2012 20:40:21 GMT -6
lol. you don't penalize teams for real life gm's mistakes. Starting with a shitty team and then not having your pick on top of it is lame.
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Sept 3, 2012 20:49:50 GMT -6
I'm on the fence with all of this, but I'll go with the poll results
Could maybe give certain teams extra year(s) on their CY to compensate
|
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on Sept 3, 2012 21:18:09 GMT -6
and to simplify it, instead of it being top 12 protected or such, just make it lotto.
|
|
|
|
Post by footy on Sept 3, 2012 23:58:45 GMT -6
You beat me to it.
And yes.
Its only fair.
|
|
|
|
Post by footy on Sept 4, 2012 0:00:16 GMT -6
lol. you don't penalize teams for real life gm's mistakes. Starting with a shitty team and then not having your pick on top of it is lame. Sucks more if all you have on your roster is shitty picks that are worth having  |
|
|
|
Post by footy on Sept 4, 2012 0:00:51 GMT -6
I'm on the fence with all of this, but I'll go with the poll results Could maybe give certain teams extra year(s) on their CY to compensate Or we could just fuck contract year right off coz its ghey |
|
|
|
Post by repole on Sept 5, 2012 11:05:02 GMT -6
lol. you don't penalize teams for real life gm's mistakes. Starting with a shitty team and then not having your pick on top of it is lame. Trading a lotto for Lowry wasn't necessarily a mistake. Why should Toronto have Lowry on their roster if they get to keep their pick? |
|
|
|
Post by Erbes on Sept 5, 2012 11:07:40 GMT -6
I'm on the fence with all of this, but I'll go with the poll results Could maybe give certain teams extra year(s) on their CY to compensate Or we could just fuck contract year right off coz its ghey Agreed. No contract year FTW! |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Sept 5, 2012 11:10:15 GMT -6
lol. you don't penalize teams for real life gm's mistakes. Starting with a shitty team and then not having your pick on top of it is lame. Trading a lotto for Lowry wasn't necessarily a mistake. Why should Toronto have Lowry on their roster if they get to keep their pick? I think if were doing current rosters we need to have the picks moved over. Otherwise draft. |
|
|
|
Post by Magna Carta on Sept 5, 2012 13:09:08 GMT -6
wouldn't be opposed to another draft. took long but was fun
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Sept 5, 2012 13:10:30 GMT -6
I think its the best way to start a new league. Gets guys way more invested in their team.
|
|
|
|
Post by rbx on Sept 5, 2012 13:25:25 GMT -6
I'm on the fence with all of this, but I'll go with the poll results Could maybe give certain teams extra year(s) on their CY to compensate Or we could just fuck contract year right off coz its ghey there's got to be another way to deal with things than the age-old usage of the cy |
|
|
|
Post by rbx on Sept 5, 2012 13:27:16 GMT -6
I'm really leaning either way. I think you should probably just keep the picks where they are, but I can't really argue against moving them to where they would be IRL. I can't even argue against doing a draft at this point. It'd be cool with the current rosters to draft but I wouldn't be surprised if everyone involved isn't interested in doing it again.
|
|
|
|
Post by footy on Sept 5, 2012 15:12:10 GMT -6
Or we could just fuck contract year right off coz its ghey there's got to be another way to deal with things than the age-old usage of the cy Agreed maybe we just fire gms when we nees too if theyre shit theyre shit |
|
|
|
Post by rbx on Sept 5, 2012 15:25:31 GMT -6
its not like its hard to realize if someone isnt working out after 2, 3 seasons.
|
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on Sept 5, 2012 15:29:25 GMT -6
I'm really leaning either way. I think you should probably just keep the picks where they are, but I can't really argue against moving them to where they would be IRL. I can't even argue against doing a draft at this point. It'd be cool with the current rosters to draft but I wouldn't be surprised if everyone involved isn't interested in doing it again. I believe ashes was very much against a creation draft. |
|
|
|
Post by rbx on Sept 5, 2012 15:33:50 GMT -6
only threw it around as an option because DBW had previously mentioned it. can totally understand if it's not wanted though.
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Sept 5, 2012 19:08:40 GMT -6
The whole point of making this file from scratch was to do a current roster league.
|
|
|
|
Post by rbx on Sept 5, 2012 19:12:16 GMT -6
not really huge on taking away picks from teams, you wouldn't normally do it. is kyle lowry really worth a lotto pick here? nba value and fbb value is a different thing
|
|
|
|
Post by Broph on Sept 5, 2012 19:12:18 GMT -6
I like the idea of current rosters, so meh at a draft
would like to see what my guys are rated though
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Sept 5, 2012 19:13:44 GMT -6
Yes Kyle Lowry is worth a lotto pick here
The ratings are low across the boards
|
|
|
|
Post by footy on Sept 5, 2012 19:15:30 GMT -6
not really huge on taking away picks from teams, you wouldn't normally do it. is kyle lowry really worth a lotto pick here? nba value and fbb value is a different thing I think its only fair, look at my team for example, I don't have much in terms of value apart from draft picks including those owed to the Suns. I think basic protections of top 5 and lotto protected are all that need to be assessed. |
|
|
|
Post by rbx on Sept 5, 2012 19:17:29 GMT -6
as soon as i looked at lowry, i realized he was really hardly a step down from deron williams as far as strictly looking at ratings is concerned
|
|
|
|
Post by rbx on Sept 5, 2012 20:45:10 GMT -6
now that ive got the raptors...i want to keep my picks ^_^
|
|
